Wednesday, September 30, 2020

Comedy of menace in the play birthday party by Harold pinter...

 Comedy of menace in the play The Birthday Party by Harold Pinter






Comedy of menace refers to the body of plays written by eminent writers such as David Campton, Nigel Dennis, N.F. Simpson and Harold Pinter. The term menace is first coined by the drama critic Irving Wardle in 1958 while reviewing the Harold pinter and David campton play. The term is basically came from the word manners in Judeo-English accent.   

The term “comedy of menace” was first used by David Campton as a subtitle to his four short plays The Lunatic view”. Now it signifies a kind of play in which characters feel the menacing presence—actual or imaginary, of some obscure and frightening force, power or personality. The dramatist exploits this kind of menace as a source of comedy. Harold Pinter exemplified the possibilities by taking into account of this kind of situation in his early plays like "The Room", "Birthday Party" and "A Slight Ache", where characters and the audience both confront an atmosphere, apparently funny, absurd but actually having suggestiveness of some impending threat or anxiety from outside. Pinter himself explained the situation thus: "more often than not the speech only seems to be funny - the man in question is actually fighting a battle for his life". He also said: Everything is funny until the horror of the human situation rises to the surface! Life is funny because it is based on illusions and self-deceptions, like Stanley’s dream of a world tour as a pianist, because it is built out of pretence.” In fact the play Birthday Party is built around the exchanges of words, which, though funny enough, contain hints that suggest the impending doom lurking around to them. 

Meg’s situation as a childless old woman who talks with repetitions may seem funny and odd, but those cover up her unconscious desire to have son, a desire she tries to fulfil through the mothering of Stanley and Petey. But Above all, Stanley’s staying in a sea-side lodge, his shabby appearance combined with inconsistent words and memorising may seem strange and invoke mild laughter but in reality he is facing a crisis which he is himself not completely aware of.



Pinter creates an atmosphere of menace through a variety of dramatic elements and techniques. First of all, he lets situations fall from a light-hearted situation unexpectedly down to one which is highly serious. For instance, while talking to Meg among other things, he tells her about a wheel-barrow which will come to the house for some body. Here we get a suggestion of impending death through the sudden reference to coffin. Again, we see Meg offering Staley the gift of a drum as a compliment to his supposed musical talent. But Stanley begins to beat it with such savagery that the audience is left dumb-struck as to the real intention behind this. 


This kind of abrupt explosion of violence is once again seen when the conversation between Stanley and mccann transformed when Stanley kicks at McCann. But more importantly, menace is presented through the fears the characters feel but cannot expressed apparently. 


First of all, fear of weather is introduced: the characters repeatedly enquire about weather, this prevails certain kind of anxiety as well as kind of a fear in the characters and this becomes obvious once the audience understand that the lodge is situated on the coast of a sea. Then Stanley tries to frighten Meg by prophesying the arrival of wheel-barrow which, of course, does not come for her. 


Another menacing atmosphere propels when the news arrives to Stanley that the two gentleman is arriving to lodge along with him in this h lodge., hearing the visit of two strangers, Stanley feels a complex fear as well as anxiety to lose the position which he possesses—first of all, the fear of being driven away from the lodge which has become for him as comfortable as his mother’s womb. A house represents security and comforts from the hazards of the outside world but sadly it is impossible to sustain. Goldberg and McCann is the embodiment of menace from a hostile outside world. We also note that he stays in a lodge, which cannot be a substitute for home. Secondly, Stanley faces the fear of being persecuted by the intruders. That is why he expresses his desire to run away with Lulu, but is afraid of doing so in reality.  


With the hosting of the birthday party, the play reaches its climax of menace. A birthday party is expected to be a ritualistic celebration of one’s life, but in the case of Stanley it turns out to be the greatest ordeal of life leading to his complete mental dysfunction. The audience now understand the menace turning real though in transformed forms. Stanley faces not only physical assault but also a torrent of words, with the serious accusations like "He’s killed his wife" mingled with trivial and ludicrous like "Why do you pick your nose?". The persons who could have saved him are either absent or drunk.



The play ends with Stanley’s forced removal from the house by Goldberg and McCann who leave a further note of unknown menace awaiting Stanley in near future. This uncertain menace is further strengthened by Petey’s inability to communicate to Meg what has exactly happened with Stanley. To conclude, it can be said that the final impression of the play on the audience echoes Pinter’s own words: " In our present-day world, everything is uncertain, there is no fixed point, we are surrounded by the unknown ... There is a kind of horror about and I think that this horror and absurdity (comedy) go together". 




Sunday, September 27, 2020

Six elements of play by Aristotle...

 according to Aristotle Tragedy is an imitation of the action that is serious, complete and of a certain magnitude through pitty and fear effecting the proper purgation catharsis. 


He states  that any tragedy can be divided into six constituent parts.

    These are: Plot, Character, Thought, Diction, Song and Spectacle. 


Plot- The Plot is one of the important part of a tragedy. The plot refers to ‘the arrangement of the incidents’ or "series of events". Normally the plot is classified into five acts, and each Act is further divided into several scenes. The dramatist’s main skill lies in dividing the plot into Acts and Scenes in such a way that they may produce the maximum visual effect in a natural development. Aristotle asserts three important classification of any tragedy is unity of plot, unity of time, and unity of action. Thus plot unity among the acts or scenes is very much essential for constructing the play and it must be united or linked to each other so The readers can grasp the essence of the play.


 Character- Characters are those who perform in the Play in simple words, characters are men and women who act. The hero and the heroine are two important figures among the characters. Different plays like comedy or tragedy consist of different kinds of characters, for example in comedy characters possess the several flaws where as in tragedy the protagonist holds the highest virtue or a virtuous quality. person with the virtue in tragedy where as a person with the flaws in comedy. 


Thought- Thought means what the characters think or feel during their life sphare in the development of the plot. The thought is expressed through their speeches and dialogues. 

Diction- Diction is the medium of expression or language through which the characters communicate or reveal their thoughts and feelings. The diction should be ‘embellished with each kind of artistic element’. 


Song- The song is one of the embellishments technique. The decoration of the stage is the major part of 

Spectacle- the spectacle. The Spectacle is theatrical effect presented on the stage. But spectacle also includes scenes of physical torture, loud lamentations, dances, colourful garments of the main characters, and the beggarly or buffoonery appearance of the subordinate characters or of the fool on the stage. These are the six constituent elements which construct the tragedy.  


Wednesday, September 23, 2020

What is drama? definition history and dimension...

 Play or drama is a specific jondra of fiction which is performed and mend to be performed wether in theatre or television play, Opera, mime, ballet, etc. Are considered a performing art for theatrical presentation in theatre or television. 



The term drama is drive from the Greek word "Drao" which means Action. Earlier it was also said the term  has been coined by ancient Greek term which means "I do".

  the term play first of all drive from from Anglo section word "Plegon" and in Latin it was "Ludus". 

 Earlier dramatist was called playmaker and play house for theatre until William Shakespeare. 


 Aristotle in his dramatic theory Poetics introduced two kinds of dramas comedy and tragedy. in which he commented that the tragedy is the highest form of drama.  Aristotle also introduced six elements which constitute a drama. These constituent elements are Plot, characters, thought, diction, song ,, and spectacles. 



  Mime is a form of drama which uses the technique to express the action of the plot only through movements of the body. It combines the music it becomes The dramatic text in Opera is is generally in a musical form of a song. Ballets dance is a performing art in which it imitates to express the emotion and action of the characters. 


Further on we will look upon the history of drama and how it emerged as well as different aspects of drama.

Tuesday, September 22, 2020

Significant of the title The Glass Menagerie by Tennessee Williams... COMMENT UPON THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THE TITLE THE GLASS MENAGERIE BY TENNESSEE WILLIAMS. . .

 glass menagerie one of the celebrated text of Tennessee Williams, it can be manifested at various level and it has symbolic meaning in terms of the title itself too. Although in the family, the relationship between one another is quite disorganised,  dysfunctional, inappropriate and questionable.  Manifestation of the title The Glass Menagerie and it's deeper meaning to which the title foreshadows. The text opens with the family having supper. As this dinner continues it seems clear that they are living in a single parent household along with mother, Amanda, who is fantasized in her youth, a son, Tom, who is looking for an attempt to separate himself from the dysfunction of his mother, and a daughter, Laura, a physically handicapped that hampers her from participating in day to day activities including interacting with people. But as the story puts forward along with Laura is somewhat broken out of her shell, Tom moves out, and Amanda comes close to her daughter. The title “The Glass Menagerie” seems to suggest transparency, fragileness as well as menagerie refers to the fragile world, which need special attention and care, which elucidates exactly what this family is like and requires. Analysing the play in terms of their relations to the title it seems clear that the title has more meaning then it meets at first glance. Some may argue that the title has no relation as far as the play is concerned so far, due to the dilemma such as who is the Central character? and how the title does not help in defining the underlying meaning of the play? These questions may very or  change, but the question, why is “The Glass Menagerie” a suitable title? 


The glass menagerie is an apt title because of it's symbolically an illusive perspicacity which leads towards a certain mystery to the play, it unfolds  demure quality to the characters in relation with life, and it provides to the symbolic meaning to the characters. 




 In the play there is a scuffle scene between Tom and Amanda when they are having an argument about Tom and where he spent his time when he leaves home after work. As the scuffle arises Laura’s collection of figurines shatters that composed of delicate glass which shaped as animals which symbolises Laura and her delicacy itself.. Glass is both fragile and delicate which puts some lights to describe Tom and his mother’s affinity, and the figurines glass scatter at the time when there own relationship cracks. The mystery is why this glass? Why the glass menagerie at this particular time? The implied Enigma would reflect the fact they are in somehow like the glass figurines and are decorated in a glass case making them venerable, fragile and easily broken. 


The titles mystery is not just towards the character’s delicacy, but the mystery of the titles affiliation with impossible dream and illusion of life surrounded by the fragile world of illusion and dreams of life.



It is clear to point out the irrelevance of Amanda’s fantasized illusion and dreamlike attitude, tom’s get away attitude, and Laura’s over charged shyness, but there behaviors are not to completely out of context or irrelevant to reality of life. At the beginning of the play Tom says “"I reverse it to that quaint period, the thirties, when the huge middle class of America was matriculating in a school for the blind.”(282-83) Tom offered an  insight to a time period when the economy was stumbling and struggling due to the immense depression. Life at that time was difficult, and for Amanda being the only parent in her household it was even more more difficult. Her reverting back to her past is not at all for fetched or uncommon. Humans desire to return back to their best time the time when they have enjoyed their lives so they are able to cope up with the present. All the characters found ways to cope up with there situations whether it is bunking class or going to the movies. Laura’s defect gave her introversion that most people suffer from, especially those in her position, and Tom’s desire to come out of the nest stems from him getting older and not being able to experience what young men of his age achieve. The complicated circumstances and the fragileness of the economy marks the title suitable and its relevance to life and it concatenates some specific meaning to each character.



The underlying meaning of the title brings the front the symbolic meaning to the characters.  the title of the play The Glass Menagerie not only adds in the symbolic interpretation of the characters but it also adds in the theme of the play which sets the tone of the play and its meaning as illusion and impossible dream which construct the fragile world and its dreams which is so delicate as the glass figurines. and its characters would be just that, characters in the fragile world as the animals in the glass which can be scatterd with a slight touch of reality and all the illusions disperse. Because the play uses real life situations it makes easy to comprehend with the circumstances to the characters and actually understand each of them. Tom says at the end of the play “I didn’t go to the moon, I went much further-for time is the longest distance between places.”(329) through this statement by Tom, it can be drawn or analysed that these characters consist constructive and deeper desire as well as aspirations for more then offered. Being a narrator Tom represents all the characters and their insight of how they perceive the world around them. As the play puts forth towards ending, characters evolve from being associated or being in a glass case to finding their way out of that enclosure. “The Glass Menagerie” is no longer remained a relic or just a title about a glass figurines, but instead a window into the characters desire and unfulfilled dreams of lives.



 Thus “The Glass Menagerie” is an appropriate title for such a symbolically enriched play. Some would not agree that “The Glass Menagerie” is an apt title. Amanda’s fantasized perception and fascination with the past, Laura’s “inferiority complex due to her physical disturbness” (321), and Tom’s urgency to come out from sense of captivity is as obvious as the title and is simple as symbolic as the characters perform. This can be interpreted as the family fails to achieve the desire rather their dreams become impossible and it breaks as the glass scatters. however they don't seem to be as transparent as the title suggest the glass, there are few moments which bring this belief that Amanda’s reasoning’s to live in the past is based upon her present condition and because of that she wants her kids have better lives then she had. Toms unhappy and displeased mood causes him to write poems, and narrate the play so we are able to understand and know what the family’s current situation is and could find a relation to them and our own lives. Laura’s shyness and her blossoming nature insinuates at the end of the play how much she is as a character and how she is the most important figure in what the title tends to demonstrate in the play.



 Tennessee Williams takes into account  the world of a middle class family in the 1930’s who faced various issues related with their day to day life and that they may or may not be fully aware of, and Makes it visible in the fore front so that the readers can feel what these characters experience. mother plays the role of both parents because of their broken household and offers her an image from her current situation which reconstructs her youth or dream world and brings to the front a son who sees his broken family and cannot help or fight the fact to get rid of, so he indulges into watching movies or to drink, and a daughter who is physically challenged and allowing this disability to control her back to be a women she should be, and the beauty she poses. These characters give insight view to what is real. Making a glance towards the title what the author wants to insinuates through the title The Glass Menagerie has to deal with one hand it breaks the preconceived notion and idealized perception about the dream world which is fragile and delicate as if made of glass and impossible to achieve, another hand it suggests that the idea of illusion and impossible dream is scatters with a slight touch of reality such as the glass figurines breaks. so it needs proper care and attention in order to achieve the dream. Means glass is easily broken, can have cracks, and makes even the tiniest flaws visible. So it needs proper action to maintain the delicacy in this rough world.

Tuesday, September 15, 2020

Immigrants American writers

 Struggle of immigrant writers in America and establishment of their identity as a writer.  



American literature is the literature which refers to the writings that is written or produced by people of America. These days American writing has reached the apex of creation because of their native and migrant writers. To understand the American literature in the context of migrant Writers we must take into consideration their history of migration, their struggle for their identity in American writing. Their way of writing, theme and ideology; and establishment of the writing in the literary relms of America. 



What constitute contemporary American immigrant literature to elucidate this question we need to start by considering the Global immigration in later 20th century as well as American immigration policy. During the 1840 to 1880 number of immigrants were 5 million who mostly came from UK Ireland Germany etc. Because of famine and social upheaval. The first quarter of the 20th century it reached 2 17 million . 1920 migration ended to control the flow of immigrance. In 1965 hart cellar immigration act abolished the National Kota system.  



Though not born in American soil but   Still became US citizen, some were pushed by political forces some came for job opportunity but each brought a new thread to American tapestry. Struggle with the issue of migration reform, they played a significant role in American literature and culture. 


American literature has been reached The Apex of creation in the realms of literature. There are a number of Writers who achieved the Nobel Prize for their works. sinclair lewis is the first writer who achieved the Nobel Prize in 1930 this is the first time in American history. After that many writers like Toni Morrison , Ernest Hemingway and many more who achieved a Nobel Prize and established a distinguished identity in the world creation of literature. 



History of American literature was not much older. John Smith was considered the first writer of American literary history. It doesn't mean that American people were not involved in Literature but there literature was mostly in oral form. Their poetry story myths where mostly in oral form that's why that were not preserved. After the 1600 they started to write in English when they are colonized by European country. More over they started to write about social and political condition of their country. When the migrated peoples started to live there but they are still attached with their country. 


When some immigrant writers started to write they mostly wrote about their love with their motherland , their culture, their community. and memoir. Khaled hosaini who was from Afghanistan and after the Russian invasion in 1983 he became the US citizen. His book kite runner in 2003 was achieved a great uplore and became the best New York seller throughout the year. In which he depicted his journey of life from Afghanistan to America and his struggle in in Afghan. 



Women also played very monumental role in contemporary migrant voices. South Asian women also started to write about their culture and individuality. They are mostly writing about their own life. Sara suleri in her book the "Meatless Days" in 1983 .bhapsi sidhwa is another writer who wrote for her parsi community. 



Immigrant writers mostly consist the theme of diaspora, anxiety, freedom, self independency, a sense of despair, individual Desire, etc. 



Immigrant writers also played very significant role in the contemporary American literature. They mostly wrote about their anxiety of dispora and culture. They expressed their struggle for identity with their distinct culture. 






A postcolonial reading of the novel THE VOICE BY GABRIEL OKARA... THE VOICE BY GABRIEL OKARA AS A POSTCOLONIAL TEXT...

    Postcolonial reading of the novel "THE vOICE" by Gabriel Okara



Postcolonialism is a theorettical approach in various discipline that is concerned with lasting impact of colonization in former Colony . 

Post-colonialism REFERS to the temporality or time period , after the colonialism . While  postcolonialism denotes to the atitude. 



Frantz fanon wrote in his Wretched of the Earth, "colonized subject Must reclaim their past".  


There are three phases adopt, adapt and adept . First phase adopt in which writers imitating the their colonizers they are writing as it is. For example if the colonizers are wearing coat pant their colonized subject and so imitate them to look like them by wearing the same coat pant. , 

second phase Adapt in which writers insert their identity in  the medium provided by the colonisers, for example colonized people imitate them by wearing coat pant but insert their own identity with the coat with dhoti and others. 

and third phase in which writers away from colonialism . They have their own identity .  

 


Postcolonialism refers to the revolt any part of land, community country, any part of the world where people fight against the any colonial subjugation . Postcolonialism doesn't mean after independence it started when people started to think that Britishers are outsiders , they are colonial rulers , they are not their own rulers . Every country got their Independence through struggles , because movement came out like student movements, political movements, labour movements etc. , That movement has created emotion of post colonial attitude . It is a reaction of colonialism . It can be a movement, , a book, article, poetry, play, performance either it can be body language it can be an attitude as a rejection of colonialism . Postcolonial writers are not writing for anything else but they are only writing for their country their problems their issues . In simple terms postcolonialism it's not a literary theory, it's not a technique of reading, it's not a technique of literature, its not a style,  Rather it's an attitude . 


 


This particular novel "the voice" is about people of Africa, their culture and their problems . This novel has been written by Gabriel Okara in 1964

 After the independence of Africa . There are various elements can be seen in this particular novel . Story and and the content and style is also postcolonial. The Nobel reflects the vices of the society and struggle of people after colonization. 



From the beginning of the novel narrator invokes God or diety of his region in order to insert his  culture. 

It is about society how society is surrounded by superstitious believes that after death of a girl's parents or family member tuere is considered a Jinx and inauspicious women . When Akolo comes after getting higher education the people of his town considered him a mental . The beliefs that when a person get the higher education he becomes mental .  

Akolo attempts to fight against the corrupt system against his ruler , it is demonstrated that if you are around that your voice will be killed you will be killed .  

When tuere says ,she has not hidden akolo come and you can inspect him,  people avoid and answer we are religious she could not do anything to them . It's also a comment upon the religious beliefs of people they are religious but how could anyone allow a girl to live alone outside of the village . Does religion allow it?  

When akolo is caught by villagers he feels that he is independent as compared to the villages because they cannot act own his own . At least he is acting freely . 

He ealks out in search of it 

 He finds in Sologa everyone is busy on his work in order to survive themselves . People don't bother about corrupt system; he attempts to find truth, morality, peace  but he fails  

He also demonstrates that education is inebitable to be Awareness of the condition as well as to distinct morality and immorality. Akolo attitude against the authoritarian regime is quite revolting like the postcolonial do in order to get the identity and self realisation.when the people started to think about the morality and immorality and understand that they are subjugated by their colonizers and they have lost their identity. the people of the village act as if they have no capacity to think and react rather they act behalf of the administration and what they have been told only without realising it's repercussion and its morality. 




The style of the novel is also postcolonial, Gabriel Okara deviated in his Novel like he has used English vocabulary but in African Sintex like; we generally use where are going bt okara has used you where going. In simple terms okara has used english  africanized way. a writer also portrayed a picture of His country rich culture, folk dance etc not only with the intention to demonstrate the African culture but also to to distinct from the colonisers culture inserting it's on culture and identity narrator wants to distinguish himself through his writing style. 



Conclusion 


By this way we can say that this novel is very much postcolonial not only in terms of story but style is also postcolonial...

Monday, September 14, 2020

History of English language. how history of language evolved? defining complete history of English language.

 History of English



Language is a medium of communication among people and it developed gradually over the period of time. In terms of English language it also florist gradually over the period of time and several factors such as geographical, historical, social diversities are responsible for the development of the English language. 




Albeit  it seems easy defining the term English in English studies  but it poses several challenges. English does not refer to the England merely which is the part of United Kingdom of Great Britain and northern Ireland rather it refers to the English language. But which English language because it has multiple varieties such as geographical social and media diversity. To understand the English language we have to take into consideration these diversities. 


 

Geographical diversities 

1. National varieties such as American English, British English Caribbean English Indian English Singaporean English etc which compete in terms of their standard.  R.p is considered a correct pronunciation of the word. 


2. Regional varieties  differentiate in terms of their pronunciation accent use of vocabulary and dialect as well as use of grammar. 


3. Creoles  it has all features of the native language and . It functions as a native language. As well as it has its own native speakers.  


4. Pidgin  it is a kind of secondary supporting language which has no native speakers.  

  




Middle English - 


    It is dated from 1066 when the norman invaded from Normandy William the conquest took the Throne of England. It was the time when the Indo European languages such as French has been spoken widely. Around Ten thousands norman words have been taken into English language which start with the suffixes eg tion, ance, ence, ty, ment, ant, ent, etc 

And prefixes eg co, pre etc. 


 

Anglo saxon words for cow Ox ship swine, calf etc live or raw animal are anglo Saxon words where as beaf, veal, pork etc are french words for cooked animals.  

 

  


French language is adopted by normans extensively, which was considered so called Romance language that was usually derived from latin not from the Germany which was the branch of Indo European languages. Not a single norse word survived in Normandy however other Romans spoke rural dialect of French with considerable Germanic influence usually called Anglo Norman or norman French . Which was quite different from the standard French of Paris of the French. 

   Arrival of the King Henry IV in 1399 English became the mother tongue of England, anglo norman world used to verbal languages such as Court administration culture, though Latin words used 4 written purposes such as Church and official records. 

  Majority of the population in estimated around 95% started to speak English language. Normans considered English as a low class languages where is French and Latin for the upper class or Elite class languages. Does two languages emerged and developed parallel gradually merging as norman and anglo saxon begin to interlinked or intermarry . The mixture of these two languages old English and Anglo Norman usually refers to the middle English. 


   


Geoffrey chaucer played a significant role in the development of the English language. His book Canterbury Tales written around 1380 written in English language when the Latin and French words were dominating the society and influencing the people. He had contributed around two thousands vocabularies mostly from french in origin ,eg difficulty, significant, dishonest, ignorant etc 

He had used much more old vocabulary and he also he used the word which had been falling out from the favor, eg churlish, farting, friendly, learning, loving, restless bhai feeling willingly etc. 



List of words which occured first time eg absent,, accident, Add, agri, border box, desk desperate, envy, digestion, obscure observe, perpendicular, princess, Caesar, session, theatre,, Galaxy, Horizon,, wildly, etc.   

This is the face of continuous Changing of the language all this time. Even day single authors used to right different spelling of the word in there different manuscript, chaucer also Incorporated a single word in different ways which was quietly visible, different spelling in a single manuscript differently, eg yeer, yere doughtren And doughtres etc. 



Apart from chaucer William langland also Road in English language named Pears plowman, the anonymous; sir gawain,  in 1384 John wycliffe produced t translation of the Bible. However that Church has banned this Bible because it was written in the Vernacular English language where the Latin was considered the godly language. Still unofficially it was circulated in the society, around 1000 words has been incorporated in the English language from Latin via french such As, Barbarian birthday,, childbearing, canopy, communication , crime,, dishonour, envy, Glory, humanity, nobility, justice, Madness, multitude,, zeal, etc. Wyclif's translation of Bible was nevertheless considered the landmark of the English language. 





Early modern English 

    


Early modern English is dated from 1500 ad to 1800 ad. This was the time when English florished on its real form along with latin and french.  Latin was considered the language for learnings. The main distinction between middle English to modern English is great vowel shift, which started from middle English and continued till 1700. Long bowel but pronounced longer and short vowel are pronounced shorter. Long vowels word pronounced from front of the mouth. Like sheep, like etc 


  Words  like H, c, k have been removed from English vocabulary, like knight became night, , walk, talk, history , lock, folk etc have been k, l, h etc sound were silent. 


The main purpose of the great vowel shift is quite debatable till now but it can be said that it occured in order to distinct itself from the other Romance languages such as French Latin Spanish etc.


  

Invention of printing press 

  Printing press is considered one of the World's great technological invention and it played a significant role in the development of the English language. Almost ten thousands to twelve thousands words have been incorporated in the English language due to printing press. Around twenty thousands books have been printed in around one hundred fifty years . Firstly printing press was invented in Germany bye guttenberg but later on it had been travelled to England by William caxton, who published his first book translated from latin language named "rucuyell of history of Troy". It also played a many mental role for the universality of the spellings. 


  


Renaissance contribution in English language 

   It started from fifteen century and continued its impact till meet 17th century. Renaissance is considered the revival of the art and humanity. Literature and music was dominated during this  age. The major impact of Renaissance was religious consciousness  and spirit for enquiry increased. People started to Quest about the things and became reasonable. . 

  Shakespeare, the renowned figure of The Renaissance contributed alone in the English vocabulary , he himself used around thirty five thousands words and around two thousands new words have been coined by Shakespeare. He used now as a verb, work as a adjective, he used prefix and suffixes for the creation of the new words. 



Coming of the dictionary 

  Samuel Johnson has come up with the dictionary of English in 1755. Which has been greatly impacted the English language in terms of vocabulary pronunciation as well as spellings. Before the coming of the dictionary there were a number of spelling had been circulated in the society. But after its compilation uniformity of spelling came into existence. 


 

Translate 

 translation of Bible 

  Earlier the Bible was translated by wycliff later on it had been translated by tyndele which was executed by the king because of that time the church was dominating the society and due to the translation it made people aware of the religion , so he had been assassinated. In 1611 James first translated Bible into English language because of that there are innumerable words have been found, as well as phrases like, God created Heaven in the earth, root of the matter, B horribly terrified, turn the world upside down  etc. 


   


Coming of the English grammar 

   In addition to English dictionaries several grammars started to appeared in 18th century.   The most influential grammar book was considered Robert lowth's gay short introduction to English grammar published in 1762. And lindley Murray's English grammar in 1794.  Distance from Kudi grammar it clarify to correct use the way of English, and not to use preposition at the end of the sentence. The first newspaper was published in 1622 named courante. London gadget it was published in 1665.  time of London was published in 1790 during that time of influential periodicals the tatler and the spectator, which established the style of English. 


  1602 1800 what is considered the golden age of the English language. During this period of early modern English in 1650 around ten thousands words have been added in the English vocabulary . During this period all scholarly articles were published in either latin or French. Sir Isaac Newton, Thomas more etc used to publish their articles in Latin. Francis Bacon firstly published his writings in Latin and after that in English. He has coined the terms like thermometer pneumonia encyclopaedia etc. 



International trade 

    In 16th and 17th century international trade was started by Britain throughout the world . In order to trade marketing there were several foreign words were taken into English language such french word bizzare, position, chocolate, congrats, comrades. Etc.  


 


Establishment of schools and institution 

  Establishment of the school and institution played a significant role in the standardization of the English language through these institution the main received pronunciation of the word are to be spoken out by the people. . 








The distinction between early modern English and let modern English or simply modern English is sometimes refered to lies in its vocabularies pronunciation grammar and spelling remained rather unchanged. Let modern English accumulated many more words which was result of to measure historical factor such as industrial revolution which necessitated several words for things and ideas that had not previously existed. And second was growing of the British Empire which adopted several foreign words and made it own.  


 


Industrial revolution  

  The most of the innovation and invention of 18th and 19th century were British origin. Late 18th century and 90th century scientific and technological output were written in English. Various development of Technology and equipment as well as manufacturing industry as well as new means of transportation eg steamship Railway etc. 

There are a number of words has been added to English eg camera refrigerator photography typewriter . 

Words from medical field alsojoined in english eg conjunctivitis cancer, insulin, aspirin. 

What's  



British Empire or colonization 

   Since Britain has started its colonization from 16th century but it reached to the its apex in 18th century to early 20th century. This was the time when the English became the language of power it was dominating all over the world. In other words English became the language of the world.. Britain was drooling organised the almost one fourth of the world from Canada to Australia India to Singapore Egypt to South Africa. 

Colonies were happy to learn English language in order to get profit from British industry and Technology advancements. They were numerous words have been adopted by British and they made them  own. Some Australian words like Kangaroo as well as some Indian words such as pajamas, bunglo, loot, jungle, shampoo etc. 

 Due to the colonization over the period of time English became the language of the world and later on it was divided into several new English such as American English Caribbean English Singaporean English British English Indian English. 


Conclusion 


Through the history of English language it can be drawn that English is one of the language originated from every part of the world through different periods and different languages. It's the inventions contributed over the period of time to flourish the English language and it continued. in order to expand the English language everything like books translation grammar school business inventions have contributed and now the English language became the global language and it has several parts such as English as a foreign language English as a secondary language and English as a native language. And the basic nature of the English is to evolve and it continues to evolve every year. 




Sunday, September 13, 2020

Caucasian Chalk Circle as a Parable play by Bertolt Brecht...

   Caucasian chalk circle as a parable play. 


    




 

  Caucasian chalk circle is one of the celebrated play of bertolt brecht which published in 1944. This is considered as a play of epic theatre. In order to analyse the play as a parable we must understand the parable first. 

  


Definition of Parable

Parable is a figure of speech, which presents a short story, typically with a moral lesson at the end. You often have heard stories from your elders, such as The Boy Who Cried Wolf, and All is Vanity. These are parables, because they teach you a certain moral lesson. Parable is, in fact, a Greek word, parable, which means “comparison.” It is like a succinct narrative, or a universal truth that uses symbolism, simile, and metaphor, to demonstrate the moral lesson intended to be taught. Like analogy, we find the use of parables in verse and prose, specifically in religious texts, such as the Upanishad or the Bible. 

 



THINGS SHOULD DO BELONG TO THOSE

WHO DO WELL BY THEM”

THE CAUCASIAN CHALK CIRCLE

Justice is the bread ofthe people 

In hard times and in happy times

The people requires the plentiful, wholesome

Daily bread ofJustice. 

  Brecht, ‘The Bread ofthe People’

In writing The Caucasian Chalk Circle, the last play in his American exile,

Brecht was inspired by the two versions of legend of the Chalk Circle, the original 

Chinese play by Lihsing Dao and Klabund’s adaptation of the original play. Brecht

was mainly attracted by the themes, the two versions - social satire directed against the 

oppression by the rich, the corruption ofthe courts, the violence ofthe rulers. The play

poses basic human questions. Legal justice versus practical justice, rightness versus

expediency, good versus evil, new values versus established values, reason and feeling 

versus sentimentality, the claims of natural mother versus adoptive mother seen within

both a social and moral context.

Brecht presents the‘human comedy’of legality and justice in the play. The 

Caucasian Chalk Circle through the protagonists Grusha and Azdak. 

 The Caucasian Chalk Circle tells a parable that ex￾plores what happens when the law conflicts with justice 

and asks questions about who is right and wrong in com￾plicated situations. Setting up the play, a Prologue intro￾duces the idea that things should be given to those who 

will take care of them as two farms dispute ownership of a 

valley. Once an agreement has been reached, the villagers 

put on a play—The Caucasian Chalk Circle. 

 


The play begins as an uprising takes place in 

Grusinia (a fictional historic country in the Caucasus). 

When Governor Abashvili is overthrown and beheaded, 

his wife, Natella, flees the new regime, leaving her infant 

son, Michael, behind. A palace kitchen maid, Grusha, 

steals the child away so that it won’t fall into the hands of 

the new regime. Pursued by soldiers, Grusha undertakes 

a risky journey to carry the child to the other side of the 

mountains, where it will be safe, ‘adopting’ the child in 

the process. Two years later, when the political situation 

reverts, soldiers cross the mountains and take Michael 

away from Grusha, charging her with kidnapping the 

child.

 


Grusha and Natella must appear in court to fight 

for custody of the child; the court in which the case will 

be judged is slightly unusual. Ever since the uprising in 

which the Governor was overthrown, Azdak has been pre￾siding as Judge. Azdak is a rascal whose judicial decisions 

are highly unconventional, as they are guided not by the 

letter of the law, but instead by bribes and his own ideas 

of justice. The unconventional judge ultimately devises 

an unconventional scheme to decide who should be given 

the child—the test of the chalk circle. The results of this 

test convince Azdak to award the boy to Grusha. 


   

Thus we can elucidate Caucasian chalk circle as a parable because of its moralistic and just ful nature  

. Which teaches us the moral that things should do belong to those who do well buy them. That has been explained in prologue as well as in the play. Grusha who was not the real mother of Michael but because of her deliberate and selfless effort and care for behaviour towards Michael made her the deserving person for charge of nourishment of Michael. 

  




Saturday, September 12, 2020

Treatment of marginalized in the poem of seamus heaney...

 Topic- seamus heaney's treatment of marginalized 

 .                                                  

         

SEAMUS HEANEY INTRODUCTION

Seamus Heaney (born 1939), Nobel Prize winner in 1995, is possibly the foremost poet in the 

English-speaking world. He has produced thirteen collections of poetry spanning the years 1966 to 

2010, all of which have been critically and commercially popular. His work is widely quoted, and there 

have been some fifty monographs and collections written about his poetry, with articles and reviews in 

the hundreds if not the thousands at this stage. He has also known for a very well-received translation of the Anglo-Saxon epic Beowulf, which was 

very well received and which won the Whitbread Book of the Year in 2000 – a very rare achievement 

for a book of poetry.

His work has been widely quoted in the public sphere, and his lines from The Cure at Troy : “. . . and 

hope and history rhyme. His poetry has 

chronicled the personal and societal development in Ireland over the last forty years or so, and he has 

written about political and social problems and issues in both poetry and prose. he had been awarded the Nobel Prize: “for works of lyrical beauty and ethical depth, 

which exalt everyday miracles and the living past”, and he 

voices concerns and attitudes which resonate with the concerns of Irish people His work is both critically 

acclaimed and also popular, with sales that rival some novelists.     

Seamus heaney who belongs to the Catholic community shares the minority status in the northern Ireland. His concern for the minority or the marginalised can be relised in his poetry. In order to explain heaney's poems in terms of treatment of the marginalised let's understand the term marginalisation first.

    What is Marginalization 


  In general the term marginalization describes the over actions or tendencies 

of human societies where people perceive to under reliable or without useful 

fiction are excluded, i.e. marginalized. The people who are marginalized are 

outside the existing system of protectionand integration. This limits their 

opportunities and means for survival. The term defined marginalization can be in 

the following ways-( ) 



1) Peter Leonard defines -“Marginality as being outside the mainstream of 

productive activity.” 

 2) Latin observes - “Marginality is so thoroughly demeaning, for economic 

well-being , for human dignity as well as for physical security marginal peoples 

can always be identified by the members of dominant society and will face 

irrevocable discrimination.” 

3) The encyclopedia of public health defines - “Marginalization as to be 

marginalized is to be placed in the margins as thus excluded from the privilege and 

power found at the center.” 

4) Merriam Webster’s online dictionary defines the term marginalization as “To 

relegate to a un important or powerless position within a society or group”. 

) Ghana S Gurung and Michael Kallmair mentions,” The concept of 

marginality is generally, used to analysis socio-economic, political and cultural 

spheres, where disadvantaged people struggle to gain access to resources and full 

participation in social life. In other words marginalized people might be socially, 

economically, politically and legally ignored, excluded or neglected and therefore 

vulnerable to live hood change.

         


In the poem "Punishment" Heaney suffers from guilt for   compromising with silence, for just being a silent observer, for his failure to stop vengeance and violence of Ira.   The poem specifically focuses upon a body that had been found buried in the peat bug for around 2000 years ago. known as windeby girl dug up in 1952 in Germany.  was thought have been ritually killed Her hare had been shaved,  band covered her eyes and a halter tied her neck. 

 


In the poem Heaney refers the bog body as an adulterous who was killed for transgressing the unwritten tribals law.  he condemns the such killings of the humans for unwritten laws or breaking the taboos. 

 Metaphorically heaney uses bog body and death of the girl as a modern ira who have been punished for being close to the British army, her  had been shaved and banded her eyes and tied them with railing by The Irish Republican army. 

 Heaney expresses his sympathy for windeby girl calling her "my poor scapegoat" referring to the Bible where is scapegoat refers to the someone who gets blame for  others have done. 

At the Same time Heaney feels disappointment for being a silent observer, in terms of the definition of marginalisation we find to relegate an unimportant and powerless position in the society which he feels actually.  



In the poem "The Railway children" Heaney suggests the idea of children who belong To marginalised section of the society use to play on the Railway bridg wondering to see the sizzling of the wires and how words travel through his childhood memory putting some light upon the consciousness of the innocents to the experience, how yhe things change when maturity comes. 

      and  


in  'Tradition',  where  he  claims  that  the  'guttural  muse'  was  bullied  by  the 'alliterative  traditions'  of  English.  Heaney  compensates  for  the  bullying  through  the mention  of  Leopald  Bloom  to  claim  compensation  through  literature  for  stereotyping  and branding  Irish  people  as  'other'  in  the  colonial  English  literature.  Edmund  Spender  and Shakespeare,  for  Heaney,  were  the  masters  who  misrepresented  Irish  people  in  their works.  One  of  the  concerns  of  the  postcolonialism  is  to  critically  analyze  the representations  of  natives  as  'other'  in  a  colonial  text.  The  natives  have  always  been presented  in  negative  shades  in  the  works  of  colonizers.  In  'Stations  of  the  West'  (5),  the poet  is  unable  to  compensate  emotionally  to  the  loss  of  Gaelic  language  in  the  Gaeltacht region.  Heaney  also  compensates  for  the  linguistic  hegemony  of  English  through  poems such  as  'Anahorish',  'Fodder',  'Toome'  and  'Broagh'  of  Irish  'dinnseanchas'.  It  is  a tradition  about  the  sounds  of  a  word,  its  pronunciation  and  usage,  and  the  people  who  use it. The  relationship  between  Ireland  and  England  is  like  the  relationship  between  a victim  and  a  rapist.  Poems  such  as  'Ocean's  Love  to  Ireland'  and  'Act  of  Union'  present the  marginalization  of  Irish  civilization  through  the  forceful  imposition  of  masculine strength  of  England  over  Ireland.  The  psychological  scars  of  colonial  neurosis  are  dealt with  in  the  poems.  Heaney  exposes  the  real  motives  behind  the  White  man's  burden.  In 'Orange  Drums,  Tyrone,  1966',  Heaney  exposes  the  divide  and  rule  policy  of  Orangism which  created  divisions  among  the  Protestants  and  Catholics  in  Stations  (1975).  The sectarian  violence  and  the  ideological  divisions  are  dealt  wath  in  'July'  which  carries forward  the  


theme  of  psychological  pressure  on  the  minority  community  by  the Protestants  through  the  Orange  Drums  parade.  However  the  position  of  the  speaker-poet is  somewhat  compromised  with  the  awareness  of  his  being  of  the  minority  community and  hence  no  endeavour  is  made  for  compensations  in  the  poem.  The  parades  remind  the poet  of  their  defeat.  The  poet  feels  like  a  'double  agent'  among  the  political  big  concepts in  'England's  Difficulty'  suggesting  the  colonial  politics  of  divisions  between  the unionists  and  nationalists.  His  prayer  is  for  a  peaceful  society  where  the  world  is  not choked  with  blood .

       conclusion 

  


Heaney's  poetry  mirrors  the  plight  of  the  marginahzation  of  Irish  people  and  the impact  of  colonization  on  the  culture,  traditions,  identity,  langiiage  and  economy  of Northern  Ireland  and  throws  into  relief  the  attitude  of  hegemonic  societies.  His negotiations  are  based  around  the  binaries  of  metropolis/periphery,  self/other, colonizer/colonized,  England/Ireland.  The  major  impact  of  centuries  of  colonization  on Ireland  has  been  the fragmentation of  the  Irish  identity. Treatment of the marginalized is quite sympathetic.

         


bibliography 


https://owlcation.com/humanities/Analysis-of-Poem-Punishment-by-Seamus-Heaney https://vinhanley.com/2015/09/21/the-treatment-of-women-in-seamus-heaneys-poetry-a-feminist-critique/

Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett is an absurd play reflects the human predicament...

 




Waiting for Godot is a remarkable piece of work by Samuel Beckett

. waitingfor Godot was one of the most revolutionary plays of the twentieth century. In this 

play, Samuel Beckett experimented with ‘minimalism’ – a technique employed to create 

artistic effects with minimum possible means. When the play was first performed, many 

spectators left the theatre early because they could not understand anything. The audience 

was totally confused at the strange dialogues, characterization and lack of plot/story. Some 

critics also see the play as a reflection of Beckett’s own military experiences during the 

Second World War.



The play is a tragicomedy in two acts. It has only five characters who actually appear on the 

stage and another character, Godot who doesn’t appear on the stage at all. The whole play 

revolves around the protagonists, Estragon and Vladimir, nicknamed Gogo and Didi 

respectively. The title refers to the protagonists waiting endlessly for Godot. They wait on a 

deserted country road, with nothing else in the background except a willow tree.

 it reflects the nothingness of the plot which sets the tone for the play.

 The setting of the play is influenced by a mode of nothingness. A desolate country road, a ditch, and a leafless tree make up the barren, otherworldly landscape, which bears a surplus of   symbolism. The landscape is a symbol of a barren and fruitless civilization or life. There is nothing to be done and there appears to be no place better to depart. The tree, usually a symbol of life with its blossoms and fruit or its suggestion of spring, is apparently dead and lifeless. But it is also the place to which they believe this Godot has asked them to come. The setting of the play reminds us the post-war condition of the world which brought about uncertainties, despair, and new challenges to the all of mankind.


  


In next comes the plot. The beginning and the end of Waiting for Godot, in which "Nothing happens, nobody comes ... nobody goes, " are also determined by a sense of nothingness. The play is without the traditional, Aristotelian structure where there is a beginning, middle and a perfect ending. Waiting for Godot does not tell a story; it explores a static situation. On a country road, by a tree, two old tramps, Vladimir and Estragon, are waiting. That is the opening situation at the beginning of act I. At the end of act I they are informed that Mr. Godot, with whom they believe they have an appointment, cannot come, but that he will surely come tomorrow. Act-II repeats precisely the same pattern. The same boy arrives and delivers the same message. So, the play ends exactly where it started. In this way, a sense of nothingness or purposelessness acts as a driving force in the play.




 As per as the portrayal of characters is concerned the play also uplifts the sense of 

nothingness. A well-made play is expected to present characters that are well-observed and convincingly motivated. But in the play the five characters who are not very recognizable human beings and don’t engage themselves in a motivated action. Two tramps, Vladimir (Didi) and Estragon (Gogo), are waiting by a tree on a country road for Godot, whom they have never met and who may not even exist. They argue, make up, contemplate suicide, and discuss passages from the Bible. 


The play concludes with some beautiful exchanges between Vladimir and Estragon. 


  "Estragon: why don't we hang ourselves?



Vladimir: with what?



Estragon: you haven't got a bit of rope?


Vladimir: no


Estragon: then we can't


Vladimir: oh, wait, there is my belt


Vladimir: it's too short


Estragon: you could hang on to my legs


Vladimir: and who would hang onto mine?



Estragon: true


          


A play is expected to entertain the audience with logically built, witty dialogue. But in this play, like any other absurd play, the dialogue seems to have degenerated into meaningless babble. ‘Nothing to be done’ is the words that are repeated frequently. The dialogues the characters exchange are meaningless banalities. They use language to feel the emptiness between them, to conceal the fact that they have 'nothing' to talk about to each other.


          


In the play we come across some behavioral attitudes that are more important than dialogues as they reflect the frustration, hesitation and psychological complexities of modern people. The opening lines of play are the superb example of it. When the curtain opens we find Estragon is engaging in his another vain attempt to take off his boots. His repeated failure attempt symbolizes the meaninglessness of everyday life activities and more symbolically the meaninglessness of life itself. Throughout the play there are so many behavioral attitudes that reflect the nothingness of human life. Innumerable poses as well as deviation from the topic also depicted by beckett to insinuate towards psychological alienation. Same appears in our life we speak less but contemplate a lot at subconscious level.  Thus it reflects the human predicament in modern time through out the play with its all the essential elements of the play as such settings, plot, characters, dialogue.

 the ‘waiting’ it seems as if their very existence is absolutely meaningless. Critics have 

commented that Godot actually stands for ‘God’. Through the character of Godot, 

Beckett has illustrated a common human condition. Human beings wait and wish for 

something or the other, throughout their entire lives and Godot can be seen a similar 

objective.



Through it's theme it also signify the human predicament in modern scenerio. Critics have identified many themes, but Waiting for Godot “is a mystery wrapped in an 

enigma”].Some of the main themes in the play are waiting, anxiety, alienation, nihilism, 

existentialism, vain expectancy, flux of time, boredom, eternal recurrence, uncertainty, 

denial, friendship, suffering and so on. 

Conclusion



What is most fascinating about Waiting for Godot is that it doesn’t really end. The structure 

of the plot is circular as the play begins and formally ends with waiting for Godot. The 

audience is fully aware that the waiting goes on and on. When it was staged in London in 

1955, Kenneth Tynan remarked, ''It has no plot, no climax, no denouement; no beg/ astounding impact on the audience/readers because of this very fact. It signifies the eternal 

recurrence of human life in all its complexities. The tragi-comic elements emphasise the 

helplessness and vulnerability of the characters who do nothing at all to change their destiny. Beckett does not intend to convey and universal message rather he just presents an experience and modern human predicament truthfully in front of his audience.   




Bibliography


 Beckett, Samuel. Waiting for Godot. London: Faber and Faber, 2010 (1956). P13, p4, p18 . Pdf. 


 Web 

http://solankisardarsinh291315.blogspot.com/2014/10/nothingness-in-waiting-for-godot.html?m=1




 

Friday, September 11, 2020

Conflict between white and black in A Soldier's Play by Charles Fuller...

 




   A soldier's play is one of the celebrated text of the African American literary tapestry which presents Struggle During WWII between whites and black soldiers fighting in the war. Blacks soldiers are always despised by the whites and because of this Leeds to the tension and conflict between whites and blacks.   

During World War II, the military finally succumbed to pressure to create black combat battalions. For most

of the war, these units were largely for show and had very little role in the war effort, but near the end of the

war when the need for more men surfaced, a few of these units were finally mobilized and sent to Europe.

Some of these men, who had anticipated they would finally engage in battle, instead helped to liberate

concentration camps at Buchenwald, Dachau, and Lambach. What they saw shocked them. These black

soldiers, who had come from the segregation of 1940s America, were face to face with the effects of Hitler’s

racism. But there are other effects of racism, as Charles Fuller proves.

In A Soldier’s Play, Fuller presents one possible effect of the racism that divides the United States in the

1940s. The black soldiers at this small Louisiana post are anxious to be sent across the ocean to fight Hitler,

whom they are confident they can beat as effectively as any white soldiers can. But, as the war drags on, black

soldiers sit and wait while whites are sent into battle. This is the racism of exclusion, which breeds hatred and

ultimately leads to murder. In his play, Fuller demonstrates that sometimes racism can be turned inward. In A

Soldier’s Play, American racism is juxtaposed against the dark shadow of Hitler’s racism. By the time the

play ends, Fuller leaves the audience questioning their own prejudices and wondering if racism can be

quantitatively judged.

Much of the shock that Americans felt at the end of World War II, derived from Hitler’s ghastly extermination

of more than 11 million people. This outrage is couched in an awareness that American society could never

engage in racism is such an ugly way. But that ignores that effects of systematic racism, which dehumanizes

people and consumes them slowly, over time. Sergeant Waters is an example of how racism can destroy a

man. Waters readily admits that during World War I he participated in the murder of a young black man. The

murder occurred in France when white soldiers took an ‘‘ignorant colored soldier. Paid him to tie a tail to his

ass and parade around naked making monkey sounds.’’ Waters and other blacks slit the black soldier’s throat.

He tells Wilkie that blacks must turn their backs on ‘‘fools like C.J.’’ who would cheat their own race out of

the honor and respect they deserve. Earlier, Waters tells C.J. he has gotten rid of five other soldiers at previous

posts. And Waters explains that he did it because he does not want blacks cheated out of the opportunities that

he thinks they will derive from fighting in World War II.

This proud admission reveals the hatred that Waters has for his fellow blacks. In his eyes, blacks must meet a

higher standard that will help ensure their escape for the oppression of racism. Southern blacks, like C.J.,

recall stereotypes of black minstrels, who sing, dance, and clown around. Men who look like fools and behave

like fools will negate all that a few good blacks can accomplish, according to Waters, who believes that all

blacks must be superior to whites if blacks are to become equal to whites. But then C. J. does the unexpected

and kills himself, and suddenly Waters is forced to question what he has become. He finally understands that

he has willingly destroyed another man and turned his back on his people and has achieved nothing. Whites

still do not like him, and they still refuse to accept him as an equal. And the audience must finally admit that

they are complicit in this tragedy because they too have tolerated racism.

In constructing this play as a detective story, Fuller seeks to involve the audience in the action on the stage.

Suspects are introduced and motives explored in an attempt to keep the audience guessing. In their essay on

the detective elements of A Soldier’s Play, Linda K. Hughes and Howard Faulkner point out that Fuller

manages to implicate the audience in the quest to solve the killer’s identity and that ‘‘to the degree that we

abandon open minds and jump to conclusions about the killer’s identity at the outset, we deduce from

stereotypes instead of inductively seeking the solution.’’ This is because Fuller’s red herrings are white

officers and the Ku Klux Klan. The setting is the south, and the audience expects the killer of a black man to

be whites. 

  In that sense, the audience participates in racism. Hughes and Faulkner argue that the audience initially

sympathizes with Waters. At the end of the 


first act, he appears to be sympathetic, but as the second act

unfolds, the audience learns that ‘‘Waters is, if not a racist himself, one who imposes stereotypes and rigid

codes of behavior on fellow blacks.’’ Waters’ vision of racial progress does not include fools like C.J. This act

of black discriminating against black, just as white can discriminate against black, or white against white is,

according to Hughes and Faulkner, suggested by ‘‘Them Nazis ain’t all crazy,’’ a sentence, they argue, that

‘‘reverberates throughout the fabric of the entire play.’’ This sentence, ‘‘reminds us that World War II was, in

a sense, a racial war, a war to stop Hitler’s dream of the Super Race. But black soldiers drafted to fight Hitler

first had to confront a racial war of their own in the United States.’’ Thus Waters in both victim and

victimizer, according to Hughes and Faulkner, who also point out that the ending of the play tells the

audiences that the entire company was wiped out in that ‘‘other racial war in Germany.’’ Thus, the audience is

again reminded that both racial wars are connected for the black soldier.

It is worth remembering that Waters is not the only black man to kill another black soldier. The play’s

conclusion reveals that Peterson is Waters’s killer. Both, men, as Hughes and Faulkner note, ‘‘double as

victimizers impelled by white racism and their own capitulation to imposed stereotypes of ‘proper’ black

behavior. Both [Peterson and Waters] are willing to kill a fellow black to uphold that code, to ‘purify’ their

race; and insofar as they do so, they are also eerie parallels of Hitler, whom Waters partly admires.’’ But

racism and prejudice are not limited to Peterson and Waters. Davenport initially thinks Byrd and Wilcox are

guilty of the murder. He also assumes, erroneously it turns out, that other white officers are engaged in

covering up a white officer’s involvement. Later, Taylor, who assumes that blacks are neither intelligent

enough nor devious enough to have committed the murder, wants Byrd and Wilcox arrested because he

believes the two white officers must be guilty, since, clearly whites must be guilty. There is enough racism

and prejudice to go around for everyone in the cast to engage in some aspect of this bigotry. Steven Carter’s

analysis of Davenport’s role as detective offers some insight into how Davenport fulfills the traditional role of

detective. The traditional skills of the detective, include being able to,

place reason over emotion, admit past and even current mistakes so that you can find truth in

the present, view a situation as a whole rather than be blinded by a part, rid yourself of

preconceptions so that you can see reality more clearly. And perhaps hardest and most

important of all, acknowledge the destructive elements in your own personality so that you

can better understand the destructive side of others.

Carter states that these skills are also effective in counteracting and eliminating racism. That Davenport is able

to finally solve the case, according to Carter, ‘‘depends largely on his ability to free himself from racist

preconceptions of any type.’’ Davenport is able to stay focused on the issue at hand, but, as Carter points out,

both Waters and Peterson have become so confused and so involved with in-group bickering that they almost

lose sight of their real enemies, white racism at home and Nazi racist imperialism abroad.’’ Self-hatred, the

byproduct of systematic racism, is responsible for the destruction of both these men. As the play ends,

Davenport tells the audience that four men were lost and that ‘‘none of their reasons—nothing anyone said, or

did, would have been worth a life to men with larger hearts-men less split by the madness of race in

America.’’

Fuller asks his audience to question the effects of racism, to question their prejudices. In A Soldier’s Play, the

effects of racial self-hatred lead two men to murder, for Waters murders C.J. just as surely as if he had tied the

noose. The audience is asked to consider that ordinary men are capable of murder when pushed to

extraordinary lengths. William W. Demastes, in an article that questions the role of prejudice in Fuller’s play,

observes that the typical murder mystery looks to the extreme or atypical conditions that lead to murder, such

as the Ku Klux Klan confronting radical blacks. Instead, says Demastes, Fuller ‘‘challenges the standard,

comfortable assumptions that tensions exist only between such radical elements of both races.’’ The racism

that resulted in Nazi concentration camps shocked people, as it should. But Fuller would like his audience to engaged in identifying real culprit.  

  


a soldier's play is one of the known play of the American African literary canopy. Like many of his other works, Charles Fuller’s A Soldier’s Play shows the devastating effect racism has both

psychologically and physically on its victims and perpetrators. Fuller’s goal is to expose both overt racist

behaviors and beliefs, and those that are so ingrained in the culture that they are taken for granted. 

 , Fuller describes how the themes in his work

(and the work of other African American writers in the early 1980’s) were shifting from “focusing on our

problems with whites, to matters involving blacks as human beings.” Instead of depicting simple

confrontations between blacks and whites, Fuller was “concerned about how racism affects blacks in their

dealing with each other rather than as victims of a larger plot by whites. I want to explore the internal



psychological effects of racism.”

Fuller is also concerned about showing black men as complex humans instead of simplistic stereotypes. As

the audience sees from the various interviews with the other characters, Waters is a black man with a Messiah

complex, determined to save blacks from a racist American society; yet he is willing to sacrifice some of them

to accomplish this goal. In the process he denies his own culture and loses his identity. C. J. is a threat to him

because, by maintaining strong connections to his cultural traditions and music, C. J. maintains his identity in

the face of adversity. As C. J. says about Waters, “I feel kinda’ sorry for him myself. Any man ain’t sure

where he belongs, must be in a whole lotta’ of pain. This play reflects a 

 Conflict between white and black soldiers throughout the play at the both physical and psychological level. Through various action we can assume the conflict between white and black like, 

  At the level of alienation that black soldiers feel is best demonstrated by the baseball games that are played between

white and blacks. The black soldiers view the baseball games as one area where they can prove superiority

over white soldiers. The blacks are treated as subservient and subordinate underlings. They are not given the

opportunity to be real soldiers; instead they function as little more than servants, handymen, garbage

collectors, and gardeners. When these same black soldiers meet white soldiers on the baseball field, the game

makes them equal, and when the black team wins, they are superior. Black soldiers emerge from the games

knowing that they will be alienated and punished for winning, but their victory makes the alienation more

tolerable.

 

  There is another tools which arise conflict between white and black are Anger and 


Hatred. Although he disguises it, Waters really hates what he is—a black man, a black soldier in the army. He is so

consumed with self-hatred that he turns it upon the men in his company. Waters is given power over other

men; it is a power given by whites and largely controlled by whites, but Waters thinks that if he can do the job

well, that he can change the white perception of the black man. So he is harder on his men and crueler than a

white officer would be, and he tries to eliminate those blacks that he thinks would be unable to compete in a

white man’s world. Waters sees black survival in becoming white. He hates his own black race and his

history, and he turns that hatred upon his men, ultimately being responsible for the death of one of them.

There is another event which depict the tension between white and black. Waters betrays his men, especially C.J., when he plants evidence that implicates the young man in a crime.

The sole purpose in framing C.J. is to remove him from the company. But Waters has befriended C.J.,

praising his singing and playing. The reality is that Waters hates all southern blacks, whom he considers fools

who are perpetuating an image of black foolishness with their singing, dancing, and clowning around. C.J. is

guilty of all these actions, and in his innocence, he never suspects Waters of betrayal.

 


  



another reason for conflict is the white Prejudice over blacks. Captain Davenport faces prejudice when he arrives at a southern military post to conduct his investigation into

Waters’s death. When Captain Taylor meets Davenport, the latter is told that the white community will not

tolerate a black man investigating whites. But that is not the only reason for Taylor’s concern. Taylor admits

that in a conversation with other white officers, most admitted they did not want to serve with black officers

and could not accept blacks as equals. Indeed, when Davenport finally interviews two white officers, Byrd

and Wilcox, Byrd makes clear his distaste for the black captain. Byrd also admits that he beat Waters because

the sergeant did not treat him with the respect he deserved as an officer and as a white man. 

As American african always suffer and have controversy and conflict due to 


Racism, this also has been presented at the different level. Racism is the source for the violence that occurs at this army post. Although there are many black soldiers,

they are not welcome in the predominately white community that surrounds the post. When Waters’s murder

is discovered, initial suspicion falls on the local Ku Klux Klan, who have been responsible for attacks on

black soldiers in the past. There is a clear division on the post as well, with the white officers and soldiers

aligned against the blacks. The black soldiers feel that if they can only get overseas and into the war, they can

prove that they are as good at killing Hitler’s men as are the white soldiers. And finally, there is racism within

the black community, also. Waters is guilty of racism when he turns on C.J., whose only crime is that he is

from the south and represents the type of black man who Waters thinks is holding back other blacks. 

 When the conflict is at the psychological level it can arise hatred, detest but when it turns at the physical level it causes 


Violence. Violence was too often the result of confrontations between whites and blacks. When Waters is murdered,

suspicion first falls on white men, notable the Ku Klux Klan. But violence is also Waters primary way of

dealing with difference. Waters identifies rural southern blacks as a hindrance to black advancement. He

thinks that their singing and dancing recalls a period of ignorance and subservience that prevents blacks from

achieving equality with whites. Rather than look for a way to overcome this problem, Waters seeks a solution

in violence. Rather than educate these blacks, Waters has them jailed and placed in a prison population where

violence becomes a means of survival; C.J.’s imprisonment leads to his death.


  Conflict between white and black also be analysed at the psychological level through different Characters. 

 


Captain Charles Taylor, a white man in his mid-to late thirties who resents Davenport’s assignment and rank.

Taylor wants Davenport taken off the murder investigation because he does not believe that a black man can

accuse white men or solve the case. After interrogating white soldiers Byrd and Wilcox, Taylor orders that

they be arrested; however, Davenport proves that they are not guilty. When Davenport discovers the truth,

Taylor admits that he was wrong about African Americans being able to be in charge.



Tech/Sergeant Vernon C. Waters, a well-built African American with light brown skin who manages the

baseball team and is disliked by his men. Waters believes that black men must overcome their ignorant status. 

  Because of the inferiority complex, anger, detest, attitude for whites and white's resentment with blacks and distrust with blacks reflects the conflict between whites and blacks at the psychological label which ultimately leads to the physical level to violence. this manifestation of the anger resentment and dislike very beautifully presented in this play.







Funny house of a Negro delineates the oppression of women. play by Adrian Kennedy.

 



Funny house of a negro is a representative of the operation of female not in the direct sense but at the both level at the psychological and physical. Funnyhouse highlights the struggle of 

Sarah whose black skin evinces a lack 

of identity and a lack of social 

placement in the dominant society. 

She portrays herself onto various 

selves who punish and betray her, 

leading her to reject Blackness and 

femaleness as well, and eventually lead her to 

commits suicide. An example of 

extreme violence, it exposes the same 

conflicts African American women are 

still struggling and facing with. For Sarah, a “living 

dead” in Balibar´s words, life becomes 

“worse than death or more difficult to 

live than death itself and her failed 

attempt to “fit in” can be considered, 

 

in Bhabha´s terms, another form of 

colonized Other. Despite the media 

claims that racism is over, we may be 

facing a new kind of discrimination. 

For most women, […] they would not be so much guilty as 

ill. Mutilated, wounded, humiliated, and overwhelmed by a feeling of inferiority that can never be cured. […] Women do 

not make laws, even for themselves; that is not in accordance 

with their nature. (Irigaray 

Contemporary efforts to explain the position of African￾American women in the USA were built upon the notion of 

“double jeopardy” (Beale, 1970). Beale´s idea recognized 

that African-American women faced double discrimination 

because of their race and sex. […] they lack access to 

authority and resources in society and are in structural 

opposition with the dominant racial/ethnic group (Euro￾American) and the t.dominan L 


Luce Irigaray points out that women’s 

“prehistory”, their history prior to the feminist movement, “implies such a 

misprision, such a negation, such a curb on her instincts and primary instinctual 

representatives, and therefore such an inhibition, […] as to bode ill for the 

history that follows” (111). Consequently, women will remain: 

in a state of childish dependence upon a phallic super-ego that looks sternly 

and disdainfully on her castrated sex/organ(s). In its cruelty, woman’s super￾ego will favor the proliferation of masochistic fantasies and activities, rather than help build up “cultural” values -which are masculine in any case. . 

   In Funnyhouse of a Negro, Sarah is inhabited by various selves who punish 

and betray her even as they speak her history. She identifies herself, projects her 

self, as Freud would say it, onto those other selves; rejecting her own identity. 



Following Elin Diamond, the play follows the form of a classical Freudian 

dream. In The Interpretation of Dreams Freud states that identification 

resembles the conditions of hysterics, enabling patients to suffer on behalf of a 

whole crowd of people and to act all the parts in a play singlehanded. This 

tendency to play all parts produces an obvious threat to identity, creating an 

indistinction of the “I” and the “s/he”. He goes further in his subsequent studies 

stating that the loss of a loved object provokes identification with the 

abandoned object, setting itself inside the ego. However, and this is the cruelty 

of melancholia, the object, now set up, acts as a critical agency that reproaches 

the ego, becoming constitutive of psychic development.  

  The main character in 

Funnyhouse of a Negro is incessantly faced by her conflicting sides, all of them 

wishing to become a part of that pyramid top. Following Anlin Cheng, thecharacter’s “melancholic” construction of her ego “provides a provocative 

metaphor for how race in America, or more specifically how the act of 

racialization, works. While the formation of the American culture, Hers is a struggle to find her place in 

society by means of denying her own history. 

In the opening scene we see a grotesque imagery that is nightmarish. The 

play opens with a woman wandering across the stage as if in a trance, carrying a 

bald skull. The play’s structure then begins to unfold, not only as a growth of 

images but also as collections of events. The main character, Sarah, is played 

simultaneously by different characters who represent various sides of herself, 

sometimes saying the same lines, but never in unison, and never in dialogue 

where each might hear or understand the other. Sarah’s efforts to achieve 

wholeness and identity, and her simultaneous conflict with paranoia, and the 

will to self-destruction, ultimately result in a disintegration of her personality.  

 



tSarah’s mind, which is the funnyhouse, the madhouse, from which she cannot 

escape the deadly psychic and physical space of its rooms: 

The rooms are my rooms; a Hapsburg chamber, a chamber in a Victorian 

castle, the hotel where I killed my father, the jungle. These are the places my 

selves exist in. Each room represents not only her melancholic search for the perfect 

identity, the white one, and her rejection of her African heritage but also, her 

oppression within their wall. 

Sarah’s struggle is the struggle of all women in a world which not only 

  

mocks and rejects Blackness but femaleness as well. Probably the most powerless group, biracial women, are usually rejected 

by both races by virtue of their sex and mixed blood; an already subaltern 

condition aggravated by racial animosity. They are often a source of 

embarrassment to both sides of their family, because on their white relations 

side they are a physical statement which lowers the class status of the family. 

To her black relations she is a tangible embodiment of consorting with the 

“enemy. As 

with most African Americans, Jill Nelson reminds, “light skin is the result of 

rape and sexual exploitation during slavery”, and Funny house’s 

Sarah is obsessed with her “light” colored female identity. Her inability to 

reconcile her divided self is seen in the play through the multiple characters or 

personas that are all parts of Sarah’s selfhood. Lee suggests that Kennedy 

created Sarah as a mulatto rather than a ‘black’ girl to emphasize Otherness by 

taking marginality in Euro-American culture to its extreme. Sarah’s 

desire to be assimilated by the dominant culture seems a natural rejection of 

being stigmatized by society’s definition of Otherness. 

Central in her struggle are her parental figures, which psychically haunt 

her. Although Sarah’s mother looked white, “My mother was the light. She was 

the lightest one. She looked like a white woman, she was in 

fact biracial, and Sarah’s father was ‘black’. This is psychically most disturbing 

to Sarah, who identifies so strongly with her mother that she cannot resolve the 

racial conflict of her birth. Her mother, who is dressed in a white nightgown 

carrying a bald head, continuously mutters “Black man, black, man, I never 

should have let a black man put his hands on me. The wild black beast raped me 

and now my skull is shining”. 



The play is dominated by a threat of rape by her father who, she believes, 

continues to come to her room, knocking loudly throughout the play in an 

unending ritual suggesting incest and violence, 

Victoria. (Listening to the knocking) It is my father. He is arriving again for 

the night. (The Duchess makes no reply) He comes through the jungle to find 

me. He never tires of his journey. 

Duchess. How dare he enter the castle, he who is the darkest of them all, the 

darkest one? My mother looked like a white woman, hair as straight as any 

white woman’s. And at least I am yellow, but he is black, the blackest of 

them all. I hoped he was dead. Yet he still comes through the jungle to findme. 

 Through these scenes we can assume the operation of women at the physical level where Sarah' mother was raped bye Sara's father and she is also experience the same atrocities every night. 


  Hair takes on importance throughout the piece, its progressive loss equated 

with the loss of African-American identity. In folklore hair often symbolizes 

fertility or power over the person whose enemy might shear it. In this play, 

which begins with Sarah’s mother passing before the closed curtain carrying 

before her a bald head, various characters lose their hair, which slowly and 

nightmarishly falls around them. ‘Kinky black’ hair sticks out from “from 

beneath both [the Duchess and the Queen] their headpieces spring a handful of 

wild kinky hair” (2-3), while the long, straight black hair that continually falls 

out is associated with the Sarah of mixed blood who tries to be as white as 

possible. 



Duchess and Jesus (Their hair is falling more now, they are both hideous.) 

My father isn’t going to let us alone. (Knocking) Our father isn’t going to let 

us alone, our father is the darkest of us all, my mother was the fairest, I am in 

between, but my father is the darkest of them all. Ha is a black man. Our 

father is the darkest of them all. He is a black man. My father is a dead man. 

(Then they suddenly look at each other and scream, the Lights go to their 

heads and we see that they are totally,  

 Throughout the play, the farther away one gets from ‘blackness’, the more 

hair falls out –the whiter the character, the balder. As her female selves lose 

their hair, the threat of her father’s return, of a confrontation with her 

irreconcilable blackness, grows imminent. 

Sarah‘s search for love and acceptance in the white world offers her no 

solace or comfort. She admits she doesn’t love the Jewish poet, though she 

responds wildly to Raymond’s embrace, even though he is unmoved by her 

fears and torments. Disarmed and unprotected, an archetypal fallen woman, she 

begs for love. In spite of this, Raymond watches her suffering and when he 

discovers her death his only remark is, “She was a funny liar”. To him she is an 

oddity to be observed from a distance. 

The white landlady’s scenes (there are three in the play) mark important 

structural divisions of the plot. She appears toward the beginning and at the end, 

and she appears at the precise moment the play reaches its climax. She behaves 

as a corroborating witness, like an innocent bystander responding to an official 

investigation of the events. Curiously enough, her name, Mrs. Conrad, reminds 

us of Joseph Conrad who in his Heart of Darkness narrates the inaccuracy of a 

white man to understand the African world. 

Not all of Sarah’s selves are white. One of them is Patrice Lumumba, the 

assassinated quintessential African hero. However, the fact that this is a male 

figure despises her womanness. 



 



Thus we can interpret a funny house of a negro as a text of demonstrating the operation of women at large by a single character at the both stage psychological torment as well as physical violence. sarah's mother was raped which denotes physical torture as well as sexual assault at the physical label of women how she faces the double torment because of there racial identity as well as femininity.  Sara who are always despised because of her colour also experience the same atrocities like her mother both at the psychological label. she creates 4 characters to escape from the reality and her African American identity.








Poverty is a punishment of a crime which you do not commit

 Punishment which always determines the ones disciplines. Punishment is something which also prohibits one to commit crimes. In short it can...